The Minimum Sufficient Level of Care

by | Sep 25, 2019 | CASA Blog, CASA Updates

Share this post

Since embracing my role as a Court Appointed Special Advocate in May of 2015, I have spent much time pondering the concept of a minimum sufficient level of care (MSLC). This is a standard used in our child welfare system that attempts to protect our families from individual biases and value judgments. It is a “yard stick” used to measure when a child should be removed or reunited with his or her parents. The State must ensure the MSLC is met for each child. The standard protects a child’s safety and permanence as well as the parent’s right to parent. It is a minimal standard that truly is possible for a parent to reach if they indeed wish to parent their child. Keep in mind, the MSLC is not ideal, but minimal. The level of care depends on each individual child’s needs. It will vary from child to child and family to family. Minimal…yet so complex.

As a CASA, this standard helps keep my child’s best interest in focus through a measurable, attainable lens. As a blessed, healthy, successful United States citizen, I constantly have to clean and polish my MSLC lens. MSLC does not judge how clean a home is; as long as it is safe. My MSLC lens doesn’t target material things — brand of clothes, size of  T.V., amount of toys, appearance of vehicle, presence of furniture — as long as there is a connection between the child and caregiver. I don’t need to scrutinize how successful, smart, privileged, or educated someone is as long as they can provide access for the child to education and resources.

Most of us were groomed at a young age to judge based on our own values and experiences. There is clearly enough judgement, bias, and insensitivity in the world around us. It is a challenge to break that instinct and use a MSLC lens.  The bond between the child and parent is far more important than how “worthy” a parent is in the eyes of another person. If a child is physically, emotionally, and developmentally safe with a parent, then staying with that parent is in the child’s best interest. That bond and attachment is critical to the long term development of the child. Better safe with a minimally sufficient parent than privileged with someone else. For me, this is a hard concept to grasp, but I must.

Lord, give me the patience and wisdom needed to focus on the facts that best serve my CASA kiddos.

Corinna Byler was sworn in as a Court Appointed Special Advocate in 2015 and is currently a volunteer Peer Coordinator.


Share this post

Court Appointed Special Advocates are community volunteers who speak up for the best interests of children in foster care. Volunteer CASAs work for the best interests of kids by advocating for their safety and permanency.

CASA Stories

Natalie, Noah, & Nash

Natalie and Noah came into foster care for the second time after their mom relapsed into her...

Kyla

Kyla was fourteen years old when she came into foster care. Her mom was arrested for physically...

Related Posts

Natalie, Noah, & Nash

Natalie, Noah, & Nash

Natalie and Noah came into foster care for the second time after their mom relapsed into her addiction and was kicked out of her sober living home. Their dad was incarcerated and unable to parent his kids. When they came back into foster care, Noah had already spent half of his young life in the child welfare system. A judge soon appointed a newly sworn-in volunteer Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) to the two kids.

Advocate Spotlight: Angie Dornisch

Advocate Spotlight: Angie Dornisch

Our Advocate Spotlight features Angie Dornisch, a Pastor at Hope United Methodist Church in Billings Heights. Prior to moving to Billings, Angie attended seminary in Denver. Her friend, Lyndsey, invited Angie to her swearing in ceremony to become a Court Appointed...

Take the First Step

Attend an Info Session